首页> 外文OA文献 >Understanding the relationship between suicidality, current depressed mood, personality, and cognitive factors
【2h】

Understanding the relationship between suicidality, current depressed mood, personality, and cognitive factors

机译:了解自杀,当前情绪低落,人格和认知因素之间的关系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Links between suicidality and depressed mood are well established. There is, however, little information about the emotional regulation processes that underlie the relationship between suicidality and current low mood, and how these processes differ between groups of never-suicidal (NS), suicidal ideators, and suicide attempters. As suicidality and depression are heterogeneous constructs, this study aimed to conduct within- and between-group comparisons of known suicide risk factors that are associated with emotion regulation (neuroticism, trait aggression, brooding, impulsivity, and overgeneral autobiographical memories). Correlational design using between- and within-group comparisons from self-report measures. Inter- and intragroup differences were identified using Pearson's correlation coefficients and tests of difference. An analysis of indirect effects was used to investigate whether the relationship between suicidality and current low mood was mediated by neuroticism, trait aggression, brooding, impulsivity, and overgeneral autobiographical memories, and if this relationship varied according to group type. Brooding appeared to be a consistent feature of all three groups and was closely related to current low mood. Compared to the NS group, the relationship between suicide attempts and current low mood showed greater associations with brooding, trait aggression, and overgeneral autobiographical memories. Compared to the NS group, the suicidal ideation group showed stronger associations with neuroticism and impulsivity, but these factors did not correlate with low mood. These results suggest a need for larger studies to focus on heterogeneity within suicidal populations and consider how different combinations of risk factors may heighten or reduce suicide risk. * It is well known that the severity and intensity of suicide and depressed presentations vary because of underlying dispositional and contextual factors (Fried & Nesse, ) which, in turn, affect how events are interpreted and responded to. Despite this, there is little research about how these mechanisms operate in different types of suicide groups, and their influence on the relationship between suicidality and current low mood.* Understanding interrelationships that affect current low mood is of clinical significance because past suicidal history and deteriorations in already negative mood are linked to repeated suicide attempts and completion.* Our findings show that ruminative brooding, defined as a tendency to repeatedly think about emotional aspects of an event, consistently correlates with current low mood across different types of suicidal groups (NS, suicidal ideators, and suicide attempters), and across analyses.* Findings also show that suicidal ideation and attempt groups were associated with specific personality characteristics that increased the propensity of emotional responding and interpretation compared to the NS group. The relationship between suicide attempt and current low mood had a higher propensity to be influenced by trait aggression, brooding, and overgenerality compared to the NS group. In contrast, although the suicidal ideation group correlated more strongly with neuroticism and impulsivity, these factors did not influence current low mood.* In terms of clinical practice, these findings imply that specific styles of interpretation and thinking may maintain the relationship between suicidality and current low mood. Given the cross-sectional nature of the study, however, it is not possible to imply causality. Nevertheless, the findings obtained provide some support for transdiagnostic models of cognitive-behavioural processes that could be developed further.
机译:自杀与情绪低落之间的联系已经建立。然而,关于自杀和当前情绪低落之间的关系的情绪调节过程以及永不自杀(NS),自杀思想者和自杀企图者之间的这些过程之间的区别的信息很少。由于自杀和抑郁是异质性结构,因此本研究旨在对与情绪调节相关的已知自杀风险因素(神经病,特质攻击,沉思,冲动和自传体记忆)进行组内和组间比较。使用自我报告测度的组内和组内比较进行相关设计。组间和组内差异使用Pearson相关系数和差异检验进行识别。间接影响分析用于调查自杀和当前情绪低落之间的关系是否由神经质,特质攻击,沉思,冲动和自传体自传记忆介导,以及这种关系是否因群体类型而异。育雏似乎是所有这三组的一致特征,并且与当前的情绪低落密切相关。与NS组相比,自杀未遂与当前情绪低落之间的关系显示出与沉思,特质攻击和自传体记忆的关联更大。与NS组相比,自杀意念组与神经质和冲动性的关联更强,但这些因素与情绪低落无关。这些结果表明需要进行更大的研究,以关注自杀人群中的异质性,并考虑危险因素的不同组合如何增加或降低自杀风险。 *众所周知,自杀和沮丧情绪的严重程度和强度会有所不同,这是因为潜在的性格和背景因素(Fried&Nesse,)反过来影响了事件的解释和响应方式。尽管如此,关于这些机制在不同类型的自杀群体中如何运作及其对自杀与当前情绪低落之间关系的影响的研究很少。*了解影响当前情绪低落的相互关系具有临床意义,因为过去的自杀经历和病情恶化情绪已经很消沉的人与反复的自杀尝试和完成有关。*我们的发现表明,反刍育儿(定义为反复思考事件的情感方面的倾向)与当前不同类型自杀群体的情绪低落(NS, *研究结果还表明,自杀念头和尝试组与特定的人格特征相关,与NS组相比,它们增加了情绪反应和解释的倾向。与NS组相比,自杀未遂与当前情绪低落之间的关系更容易受到性格攻击,沉思和过高的习惯影响。相比之下,尽管自杀意念组与神经质和冲动的相关性更强,但是这些因素并没有影响当前的情绪低落。*就临床实践而言,这些发现暗示着特定的解释和思维方式可以维持自杀与当前的关系。情绪低落。但是,鉴于研究的横断面性质,不可能暗示因果关系。然而,所获得的发现为认知行为过程的透诊断模型提供了一些支持,该模型可以进一步发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号